Abolish gold epaulets, a barrier to reform

Symbols are important to culture. Any symbol associated with national’s cultural rot needs scrutiny.

Gold epaulets are an example. Representing elitism, they obstruct reform.

(Epaulets, cloth devices worn on shoulder loops on uniforms, indicate the “level” of one’s role in Scouting.)

Explainer: stratified by epaulet

BSA’s most important adult-leader roles directly serve units, like Assistant Cubmaster. The remaining roles are outside of a unit, like National Territory Director.

BSA’s non-unit roles fall in two buckets:

  • Silver epaulet: Council roles.
  • Gold epaulet: National roles.

Gold epaulets mean little

When someone with gold epaulets enters a room, the response is as if a god appeared.

This mistaken fawning comes from two myths:

MythFact
The national organization is powerful.Poorly regarded, at perpetual war with the base, and increasingly scrutinized, the national organization’s inability to regrow membership and immense debt (example; there’s also a pile of debt on Philmont) places it at risk of a second bankruptcy (and this is independent of whether the original bankruptcy is shot down, which may cause a death spiral).
People in national roles have superior competence and leadership skills.BSA’s professional and volunteer advancement system is neutral on one’s competence and skills.

The system’s crowning achievement–decades of internally-sourced CEOs–were unsuited for the role. The strongest thing signaled by rising to national is one’s willingness to be loyal to a bureaucratic culture that is so moribund, despite massive 2020 layoffs, it still squanders staff time on clownish pilot programs that can’t produce new, useful knowledge.
Myths fueling gold-epaulet worship.

A new way: dull-bronze epaulet

I recommend a dull-bronze epaulet for all non-unit roles. This conveys transformative messages:

  • All non-unit roles are to serve the base.
  • Youth members, their families, and unit-level volunteers–all part of the base–are the most important roles in Scouting.

Third place means serving the base

Youth and families are first place. Unit-level volunteers are a close second.

Bronze means third place. Bronze symbolizes that non-unit roles’ value rests entirely on how they serve youth, families, and unit-level leaders. Making the bronze dull avoids shininess, affirming a posture of service.

This sets a fresh expectation for the national organization. Today, national acts like its main customer is itself. With its record over the past decades, national’s overriding priorities appear to be covering up its own malfeasance, embarking on hare-brained schemes, or validating the bigotry or insecurities of some of its own professionals or volunteers.

A national organization embracing a third-place role would act differently:

Written by a National Scouts BSA Committee member in fall 2023, this shows that a key national program committee may lack value. Years after BSA enacted a separate-but-equal regime for girls, the National Scouts BSA Committee remains disinterested in doing the morally-straight thing: openly calling for immediate cancellation of the specious coed ban, which is super easy to do. If the National Scouts BSA Committee embraced its third-place role, it would have never supported a separate-but-equal regime.

The silver epaulet also goes, and this is good

It is important that national’s cultural improvements permeate the entire movement. Therefore, since the dull-bronze epaulet applies to all non-unit roles, it also replaces the silver epaulet.

With this, councils symbolically affirm national’s new cultural expectation: Serve the base.

Gold is old and busted, dull bronze is the new hotness

We have a long journey to restoring morality, relevance, and responsiveness to the national organization. Setting strong cultural expectations is a crucial, early step.

Again, symbols are important to culture. Part of setting strong new cultural expectations is addressing symbols that are associated with cultural rot.

Gold epaulets must go.


Comments

2 responses to “Abolish gold epaulets, a barrier to reform”

  1. Better yet, abolish the epaulets altogether. I know they’re more of a symbolic reference in the article, but they are a completely unnecessary and useless decoration on the uniform with a problematic history of their own, often used in the past as a gatekeeper for new members. They’re also stupid expensive for what they are and just another item for BSA Supply to stock and foist on the membership.

    Reality speaking, we just need a clean sheet uniform redesign. T-shirts look stupid and don’t really give the uniform vibe, and the current uniforms are completely unsuitable for actual “field” use. We need something in-between that just works to recognize the troop-patrol-rank structure or pack-den-rank structure, but can be used in an outdoor environment without falling apart or giving its wearer a rash.

    1. Aren Cambre Avatar
      Aren Cambre

      I agree that we need to clean-sheet the uniforms. Their current design is a result of decades of strategy-less drift, accumulating rando stuff here and there.

      I’m working on more detailed thoughts on that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Scouting Maverick: Scout Better

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading